Peer Review Process
This journal follows double blind review method preserving the reciprocal academic appreciation, respect and impartiality between authors and reviewers.
The peer review process:
- A designated member of the editorial board will make an initial assessment about the quality and suitability of a submission in terms of scope, originality and plagiarism. This assessment it allows our qualified reviewers a better usage of their time and resources. Paper written within the guidelines regarding the structure of the paper is thus very important.
- Once the designated internal editorial board member is satisfied about the suitability of a submission, it is sent to two anonymous peer reviewers for their comment.
- The reviewer will assign marks and make comment about following six categories:
– Originality of the paper
– The value of the research question and research gap.
– The soundness of the conceptual and technical or methodological framework.
– Insightful discussion in result and discussion section
– The policy implications of the paper
– Academic writing quality.
- The decision/remarks/suggestions will be communicated to the author(s).
The manuscript should not be published elsewhere without permission. Submissions will only be accepted electronically and published in English.